The Words

Jiucai (韭菜)

Chinese · 2010s · 2010s
The Chinese internet gave exploitation a botanical name, comparing ordinary people to garlic chives, a crop that grows back after every harvest, ensuring the blade never runs out of things to cut.

Jiucai (韭菜) literally means garlic chives (Allium tuberosum), a common vegetable in Chinese cuisine prized for its ability to regenerate rapidly after cutting. The metaphorical use of the term, in which people are compared to chives being repeatedly harvested, emerged in Chinese internet culture in the 2010s. The metaphor was first applied extensively to retail investors in the Chinese stock market, who saw their savings wiped out in speculative bubbles while institutional players profited from each cycle of boom and crash.

The usage expanded from finance into broader social commentary. Workers in the 996 system (9 a.m. to 9 p.m., six days a week) applied the label to describe their own position: endlessly productive, endlessly harvested, endlessly replaceable. Young people priced out of the housing market used it to describe their relationship to developers and local governments. The term captured a specific structural insight, that the system is not broken but functioning exactly as designed, producing value from a population that has no choice but to keep growing back.

Jiucai belongs to a constellation of Chinese internet terms that emerged in the 2010s and 2020s to articulate generational disillusionment with the promises of economic growth. Tangping (lying flat), neijuan (involution, meaning pointless competition), bailan (let it rot), and sang (an aesthetic of apathy) each describe a different response to the same underlying condition. Jiucai names the condition itself, while the others name the reactions to it.

The term carries a distinctive emotional register, bitter humor rather than outrage, resignation delivered through metaphor rather than protest. The chive does not revolt. It grows back. The term's popularity reflects a generation that identified the pattern of exploitation clearly and concluded that naming it was the only available form of resistance.