The Words

Job

English · 16th century · 16th century
Job began as a word for a lump of work, a task with a beginning and an end. It took three centuries to become the word for the thing that defines who you are.

The etymology of job is uncertain, but it likely entered English in the mid-sixteenth century, possibly related to the Middle English gobbe, meaning a lump or mouthful. The earliest documented uses describe a specific, bounded piece of work: a cartload, a piece of business, an individual task performed for a set payment. A job had edges. It began, it was completed, and it ended. The word described work, not a worker.

Through the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, job retained its sense of a discrete task. Samuel Johnson's 1755 Dictionary of the English Language defined a job as "a low mean lucrative busy affair" and "petty, piddling work," suggesting that the word carried connotations of small, transactional labor rather than meaningful occupation. To do a job was to perform a task, not to assume a role.

The Industrial Revolution transformed the word. As factories organized labor into permanent positions with fixed hours and recurring duties, a job ceased to describe a task and began to describe a relationship between a worker and an employer. By the nineteenth century, to have a job meant to occupy a position, and to lose a job meant to lose that position, with all the economic and social consequences that followed. The task had become a status.

By the twentieth century, job had absorbed the weight of identity. Job titles appeared on forms, business cards, and introductions. The question "What do you do?" expected a job title as the answer. The word that once described a lump of work had become the primary way millions of people described who they were.